↓ Skip to main content

Definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as conscious processes?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Definitely maybe: can unconscious processes perform the same functions as conscious processes?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guido Hesselmann, Pieter Moors

Abstract

Hassin recently proposed the "Yes It Can" (YIC) principle to describe the division of labor between conscious and unconscious processes in human cognition. According to this principle, unconscious processes can carry out every fundamental high-level cognitive function that conscious processes can perform. In our commentary, we argue that the author presents an overly idealized review of the literature in support of the YIC principle. Furthermore, we point out that the dissimilar trends observed in social and cognitive psychology, with respect to published evidence of strong unconscious effects, can better be explained by the way how awareness is defined and measured in both research fields. Finally, we show that the experimental paradigm chosen by Hassin to rule out remaining objections against the YIC principle is unsuited to verify the new default notion that all high-level cognitive functions can unfold unconsciously.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 45%
Neuroscience 24 19%
Philosophy 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,016,185
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,812
of 33,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,921
of 270,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#118
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.