You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shared vision between fathers and daughters in family businesses: the determining factor that transforms daughters into successors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00625 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathy K. Overbeke, Diana Bilimoria, Toni Somers |
| Abstract |
Family businesses are critical to the United States economy, employing 63% of the workforce and generating 57% of GDP (University of Vermont, 2014). Family business continuity, however, remains elusive as approximately 70% of family businesses do not survive the second generation (Poza, 2013). In order to augment our understanding of how next generation leaders are chosen in family businesses, we examine daughter succession. Using a sample of pairs of family business fathers and daughters and drawing on an earlier study of the dearth of successor daughters in family businesses (Overbeke et al., 2013), we reveal that shared vision between fathers and daughters is central to daughter succession. Self-efficacy and gender norms influence shared vision and when fathers and daughters share a vision for the future of the company, daughters are likely to be transformed into successors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,199,740
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#14,304
of 34,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,431
of 280,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#291
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.