You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
On interpretation of the effects of noise on cognitive performance: the fallacy of confusing the definition of an effect with the explanation of that effect
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00754 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Patrik Sörqvist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Sweden | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 13 | 41% |
Engineering | 5 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,637,946
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,532
of 29,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,793
of 267,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#166
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.