↓ Skip to main content

Controlling the message: preschoolers’ use of information to teach and deceive others

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlling the message: preschoolers’ use of information to teach and deceive others
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjorie Rhodes, Elizabeth Bonawitz, Patrick Shafto, Annie Chen, Leyla Caglar

Abstract

Effective communication entails the strategic presentation of information; good communicators present representative information to their listeners-information that is both consistent with the concept being communicated and also unlikely to support another concept a listener might consider. The present study examined whether preschool-age children effectively select information to manipulate others' semantic knowledge, by testing how children choose information to teach or deceive their listeners. Results indicate that preschoolers indeed effectively select information to meet some specific communicative goals. When asked to teach others, children selected information that effectively spanned the concept of interest and avoided overly restrictive or overly general information; when asked to deceive others, they selected information consistent with the intended deceptive messages under some circumstances. Thus, preschool children possess remarkable abilities to select the best information to manipulate what others believe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 56%
Computer Science 4 10%
Linguistics 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#387,025
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#799
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,362
of 265,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#17
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.