You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Authentic leadership: application to women leaders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00959 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret M. Hopkins, Deborah A. O’Neil |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this perspective article is to present the argument that authentic leadership is a gendered representation of leadership. We first provide a brief history of leadership theories and definitions of authentic leadership. We then critique authentic leadership and offer arguments to support the premise that authentic leadership is not gender-neutral and is especially challenging for women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 49 | 30% |
| Psychology | 22 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,228,886
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,590
of 31,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,625
of 263,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#382
of 559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.