You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms behind the testing effect: an empirical investigation of retrieval practice in meaningful learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tino Endres, Alexander Renkl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 41% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,371,216
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,669
of 34,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,976
of 275,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#172
of 572 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 572 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.