↓ Skip to main content

The relationships between interoception and alexithymic trait. The Self-Awareness Questionnaire in healthy subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relationships between interoception and alexithymic trait. The Self-Awareness Questionnaire in healthy subjects
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariachiara Longarzo, Francesca D'Olimpio, Angela Chiavazzo, Gabriella Santangelo, Luigi Trojano, Dario Grossi

Abstract

Interoception is the basic process enabling evaluation of one's own bodily states. Several previous studies suggested that altered interoception might be related to disorders in the ability to perceive and express emotions, i.e., alexithymia, and to defects in perceiving and describing one's own health status, i.e., hypochondriasis. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships between alexithymic trait and interoceptive abilities evaluated by the "Self-Awareness Questionnaire" (SAQ), a novel self-report tool for assessing interoceptive awareness. Two hundred and fifty healthy subjects completed the SAQ, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 items (TAS-20), and a questionnaire to assess hypochondriasis, the Illness Attitude Scale (IAS). The SAQ showed a two-factor structure, with good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). We observed significant direct correlations between SAQ, TAS-20 and two of its subscales, and the IAS. Regression analysis confirmed that the difficulty in identifying and expressing emotions is significantly related with awareness for one's own interoceptive feelings and with a tendency to misinterpret and amplify bodily sensations. From a clinical point of view, the assessment of interoceptive awareness by the SAQ could be pivotal in evaluating several psychopathological conditions, such as the somatoform disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 21%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 49%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,589,715
of 25,019,109 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,726
of 33,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,188
of 269,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#143
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.