↓ Skip to main content

A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
113 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim A. C. Everett, Brian D. Earp

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 168 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Student > Bachelor 38 21%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 101 57%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Computer Science 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#312,502
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#636
of 34,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,473
of 275,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#12
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.