↓ Skip to main content

Erotic subset for the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS ERO): cross-sexual comparison study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erotic subset for the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS ERO): cross-sexual comparison study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Małgorzata Wierzba, Monika Riegel, Anna Pucz, Zuzanna Leśniewska, Wojciech Ł. Dragan, Mateusz Gola, Katarzyna Jednoróg, Artur Marchewka

Abstract

Research on the processing of sexual stimuli has proved that such material has high priority in human cognition. Yet, although sex differences in response to sexual stimuli were extensively discussed in the literature, sexual orientation was given relatively little consideration, and material suitable for relevant research is difficult to come by. With this in mind, we present a collection of 200 erotic images, accompanied by their self-report ratings of emotional valence and arousal by homo- and heterosexual males and females (n = 80, divided into four equal-sized subsamples). The collection complements the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS) and is intended to be used as stimulus material in experimental research. The erotic images are divided into five categories, depending on their content: opposite-sex couple (50), male couple (50), female couple (50), male (25) and female (25). Additional 100 control images from the NAPS depicting people in a non-erotic context were also used in the study. We showed that recipient sex and sexual orientation strongly influenced the evaluation of erotic content. Thus, comparisons of valence and arousal ratings in different subject groups will help researchers select stimuli set for the purpose of various experimental designs. To facilitate the use of the dataset, we provide an on-line tool, which allows the user to browse the images interactively and select proper stimuli on the basis of several parameters. The NAPS ERO image collection together with the data are available to the scientific community for non-commercial use at http://naps.nencki.gov.pl.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 48%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#16,595,877
of 25,205,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#17,858
of 34,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,424
of 273,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#353
of 551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.