↓ Skip to main content

Sexual orientation and gender identity: review of concepts, controversies and their relation to psychopathology classification systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual orientation and gender identity: review of concepts, controversies and their relation to psychopathology classification systems
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla Moleiro, Nuno Pinto

Abstract

Numerous controversies and debates have taken place throughout the history of psychopathology (and its main classification systems) with regards to sexual orientation and gender identity. These are still reflected on present reformulations of gender dysphoria in both the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the International Classification of Diseases, and in more or less subtle micro-aggressions experienced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans patients in mental health care. The present paper critically reviews this history and current controversies. It reveals that this deeply complex field contributes (i) to the reflection on the very concept of mental illness; (ii) to the focus on subjective distress and person-centered experience of psychopathology; and (iii) to the recognition of stigma and discrimination as significant intervening variables. Finally, it argues that sexual orientation and gender identity have been viewed, in the history of the field of psychopathology, between two poles: gender transgression and gender variance/fluidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 319 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 18%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 113 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 24%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Arts and Humanities 13 4%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 115 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#727,490
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,511
of 34,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,375
of 287,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#28
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.