Title |
Distinct representations of configural and part information across multiple face-selective regions of the human brain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01710 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Golijeh Golarai, Dara G. Ghahremani, Jennifer L. Eberhardt, John D. E. Gabrieli |
Abstract |
Several regions of the human brain respond more strongly to faces than to other visual stimuli, such as regions in the amygdala (AMG), superior temporal sulcus (STS), and the fusiform face area (FFA). It is unclear if these brain regions are similar in representing the configuration or natural appearance of face parts. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging of healthy adults who viewed natural or schematic faces with internal parts that were either normally configured or randomly rearranged. Response amplitudes were reduced in the AMG and STS when subjects viewed stimuli whose configuration of parts were digitally rearranged, suggesting that these regions represent the 1st order configuration of face parts. In contrast, response amplitudes in the FFA showed little modulation whether face parts were rearranged or if the natural face parts were replaced with lines. Instead, FFA responses were reduced only when both configural and part information were reduced, revealing an interaction between these factors, suggesting distinct representation of 1st order face configuration and parts in the AMG and STS vs. the FFA. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
United States | 2 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 38% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 30% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 13 | 35% |
Neuroscience | 10 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |