Title |
How Does the Effort Spent to Hold a Door Affect Verbal Thanks and Reciprocal Help?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Glenn R. Fox, Helder Filipe Araujo, Michael J. Metke, Chris Shafer, Antonio Damasio |
Abstract |
When someone holds a door for us we often respond with a verbal "thanks." But given such a trivial favor, our feelings can vary considerably depending on how the door is held. Studies have shown that verbal thanking increases in relation to door-holding effort. However, it is unclear how such a favor can lead to verbal thanks in addition to reciprocal help. We examined how holding a door in an effortful or non-effortful manner relates to verbal thanking and reciprocal helping. We measured: (1) whether participants verbally thanked the experimenter, (2) whether they agreed to help another person by taking a survey, and (3) whether they helped pick up objects (pens) that the door-holder subsequently dropped. Participants in the effortful condition were more likely to offer verbal thanks, to help pick up the pens, and to walk a greater distance to pick them up. Participants who thanked the door-holder, however, were not more likely to provide help. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 15 | 43% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |