↓ Skip to main content

Task-Irrelevant Novel Sounds Improve Attentional Performance in Children With and Without ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Task-Irrelevant Novel Sounds Improve Attentional Performance in Children With and Without ADHD
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jana Tegelbeckers, Laura Schares, Annette Lederer, Bjoern Bonath, Hans-Henning Flechtner, Kerstin Krauel

Abstract

Task-irrelevant salient stimuli involuntarily capture attention and can lead to distraction from an ongoing task, especially in children with ADHD. However, there has been tentative evidence that the presentation of novel sounds can have beneficial effects on cognitive performance. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the influence of novel sounds compared to no sound and a repeatedly presented standard sound on attentional performance in children and adolescents with and without ADHD. We therefore had 32 patients with ADHD and 32 typically developing children and adolescents (8 to 13 years) execute a flanker task in which each trial was preceded either by a repeatedly presented standard sound (33%), an unrepeated novel sound (33%) or no auditory stimulation (33%). Task-irrelevant novel sounds facilitated attentional performance similarly in children with and without ADHD, as indicated by reduced omission error rates, reaction times, and reaction time variability without compromising performance accuracy. By contrast, standard sounds, while also reducing omission error rates and reaction times, led to increased commission error rates. Therefore, the beneficial effect of novel sounds exceeds cueing of the target display by potentially increased alerting and/or enhanced behavioral control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%