↓ Skip to main content

Introducing a Short Measure of Shared Servant Leadership Impacting Team Performance through Team Behavioral Integration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introducing a Short Measure of Shared Servant Leadership Impacting Team Performance through Team Behavioral Integration
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milton Sousa, Dirk Van Dierendonck

Abstract

The research reported in this paper was designed to study the influence of shared servant leadership on team performance through the mediating effect of team behavioral integration, while validating a new short measure of shared servant leadership. A round-robin approach was used to collect data in two similar studies. Study 1 included 244 undergraduate students in 61 teams following an intense HRM business simulation of 2 weeks. The following year, study 2 included 288 students in 72 teams involved in the same simulation. The most important findings were that (1) shared servant leadership was a strong determinant of team behavioral integration, (2) information exchange worked as the main mediating process between shared servant leadership and team performance, and (3) the essence of servant leadership can be captured on the key dimensions of empowerment, humility, stewardship and accountability, allowing for a new promising shortened four-dimensional measure of shared servant leadership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 189 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 7 4%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 70 36%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Psychology 13 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,831,413
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,106
of 29,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,789
of 393,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#312
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.