↓ Skip to main content

Being Present in Action: A Theoretical Model About the “Interlocking” Between Intentions and Environmental Affordances

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Being Present in Action: A Theoretical Model About the “Interlocking” Between Intentions and Environmental Affordances
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Triberti, Giuseppe Riva

Abstract

Recent neuropsychological evidence suggest that a key role in linking perceptions and intentions is played by sense of presence. Despite this phenomenon having been studied primarily in the field of virtual reality (conceived as the illusion of being in the virtual space), recent research highlighted that it is a fundamental feature of everyday experience. Specifically, the function of presence as a cognitive process is to locate the Self in a physical space or situation, based on the perceived possibility to act in it; so, the variations in sense of presence allow one to continuously adapt his own action to the external environment. Indeed intentions, as the cognitive antecedents of action, are not static representations of the desired outcomes, but dynamic processes able to adjust their own representational content according to the opportunities/restrictions emerging in the environment. Focusing on the peculiar context of action mediated by interactive technologies, we here propose a theoretical model showing how each level of an intentional hierarchy (future-directed; present directed; and motor intentions) can "interlock" with environmental affordances in order to promote a continuous stream of action and activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 33%
Social Sciences 12 12%
Engineering 6 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,627,918
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,004
of 29,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,069
of 395,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#106
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.