↓ Skip to main content

Duration Adaptation Occurs Across the Sub- and Supra-Second Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Duration Adaptation Occurs Across the Sub- and Supra-Second Systems
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuhei Shima, Yuki Murai, Yuki Hashimoto, Yuko Yotsumoto

Abstract

After repetitive exposure to a stimulus of relatively short duration, a subsequent stimulus of long duration is perceived as being even longer, and after repetitive exposure to a stimulus of relatively long duration, a subsequent stimulus of short duration is perceived as being even shorter. This phenomenon is called duration adaptation, and has been reported only for sub-second durations. We examined whether duration adaptation also occurs for supra-second durations (Experiment 1) and whether duration adaptation occurs across sub- and supra-second durations (Experiment 2). Duration adaptation occurred not only for sub-second durations, but also for supra-second durations and across sub- and supra-second durations. These results suggest that duration adaptation involves an interval-independent system or two functionally related systems that are associated with both the sub- and supra-second durations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 44%
Neuroscience 9 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,955,867
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,435
of 33,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,706
of 411,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#235
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.