You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Language Processing as Cue Integration: Grounding the Psychology of Language in Perception and Neurophysiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00120 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea E. Martin |
| Abstract |
I argue that cue integration, a psychophysiological mechanism from vision and multisensory perception, offers a computational linking hypothesis between psycholinguistic theory and neurobiological models of language. I propose that this mechanism, which incorporates probabilistic estimates of a cue's reliability, might function in language processing from the perception of a phoneme to the comprehension of a phrase structure. I briefly consider the implications of the cue integration hypothesis for an integrated theory of language that includes acquisition, production, dialogue and bilingualism, while grounding the hypothesis in canonical neural computation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 9 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 43 | 30% |
| Psychology | 37 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,174,677
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,391
of 34,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,431
of 312,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#99
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.