↓ Skip to main content

Contextual Effect of Wealth on Independence: An Examination through Regional Differences in China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contextual Effect of Wealth on Independence: An Examination through Regional Differences in China
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosuke Takemura, Takeshi Hamamura, Yanjun Guan, Satoko Suzuki

Abstract

The current study disentangled two different effects of wealth on psychological tendency toward independence: one is an effect exerted at the individual level (i.e., being rich) and the other one is a contextual effect (i.e., being surrounded by rich individuals). Past research has found a stronger tendency toward independence among people in economically developed societies. This association has often been explained as a result of a greater amount of choices, and thus more opportunities to express individuality that wealth affords individuals. In addition to this individual-level process, theories in cultural psychology imply that the wealth-independence link also reflects social processes-living in a rich society, regardless of one's own wealth, promotes independence (contextual effect of wealth on independence). Through a large-scale survey in China, using multilevel analyses, we found that wealth had both the individual-level effect and contextual effect on independence as well as related psychological tendencies (influence orientation and generalized trust), suggesting that individuals are more likely to be independent with greater personal wealth and when surrounded by wealthy others. Possible processes through which independence is promoted by liing in a wealthy area are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%