↓ Skip to main content

A Dynamic Network Model to Explain the Development of Excellent Human Performance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Dynamic Network Model to Explain the Development of Excellent Human Performance
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruud J. R. Den Hartigh, Marijn W. G. Van Dijk, Henderien W. Steenbeek, Paul L. C. Van Geert

Abstract

Across different domains, from sports to science, some individuals accomplish excellent levels of performance. For over 150 years, researchers have debated the roles of specific nature and nurture components to develop excellence. In this article, we argue that the key to excellence does not reside in specific underlying components, but rather in the ongoing interactions among the components. We propose that excellence emerges out of dynamic networks consisting of idiosyncratic mixtures of interacting components such as genetic endowment, motivation, practice, and coaching. Using computer simulations we demonstrate that the dynamic network model accurately predicts typical properties of excellence reported in the literature, such as the idiosyncratic developmental trajectories leading to excellence and the highly skewed distributions of productivity present in virtually any achievement domain. Based on this novel theoretical perspective on excellent human performance, this article concludes by suggesting policy implications and directions for future research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 24%
Sports and Recreations 24 19%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 34 27%