You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should Touch Screen Tablets Be Used to Improve Educational Outcomes in Primary School Children in Developing Countries?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paula J. Hubber, Laura A. Outhwaite, Antonie Chigeda, Simon McGrath, Jeremy Hodgen, Nicola J. Pitchford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 29% |
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,653,888
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,251
of 33,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,054
of 347,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#90
of 433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.