↓ Skip to main content

Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00862
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sander L Koole, Wolfgang Tschacher

Abstract

During psychotherapy, patient and therapist tend to spontaneously synchronize their vocal pitch, bodily movements, and even their physiological processes. In the present article, we consider how this pervasive phenomenon may shed new light on the therapeutic relationship- or alliance- and its role within psychotherapy. We first review clinical research on the alliance and the multidisciplinary area of interpersonal synchrony. We then integrate both literatures in the Interpersonal Synchrony (In-Sync) model of psychotherapy. According to the model, the alliance is grounded in the coupling of patient and therapist's brains. Because brains do not interact directly, movement synchrony may help to establish inter-brain coupling. Inter-brain coupling may provide patient and therapist with access to another's internal states, which facilitates common understanding and emotional sharing. Over time, these interpersonal exchanges may improve patients' emotion-regulatory capacities and related therapeutic outcomes. We discuss the empirical assessment of interpersonal synchrony and review preliminary research on synchrony in psychotherapy. Finally, we summarize our main conclusions and consider the broader implications of viewing psychotherapy as the product of two interacting brains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 423 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 15%
Researcher 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 107 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 181 42%
Neuroscience 22 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 5%
Computer Science 19 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 130 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,126,708
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,027
of 34,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,377
of 362,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#101
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.