↓ Skip to main content

Blind-Sight vs. Degraded-Sight: Different Measures Tell a Different Story

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blind-Sight vs. Degraded-Sight: Different Measures Tell a Different Story
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00901
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Mazzi, Chiara Bagattini, Silvia Savazzi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 27%
Neuroscience 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,710,047
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,383
of 29,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,513
of 325,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#116
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.