↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Personal and Job Resources in the Relationship between Psychosocial Job Demands, Mental Strain, and Health Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Personal and Job Resources in the Relationship between Psychosocial Job Demands, Mental Strain, and Health Problems
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannes Mayerl, Erwin Stolz, Anja Waxenegger, Éva Rásky, Wolfgang Freidl

Abstract

Recent research highlights the importance of both job resources and personal resources in the job demands-resources model. However, the results of previous studies on how these resources are related to each other and how they operate in relation to the health-impairment process of the job demands-resources model are ambiguous. Thus, the authors tested an alternative model, considering job and personal resources to be domains of the same underlying factor and linking this factor to the health-impairment process. Survey data of two Austrian occupational samples (N 1 = 8657 and N 2 = 9536) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that job and personal resources can be considered as indicators of a single resources factor which was negatively related to psychosocial job demands, mental strain, and health problems. Confirming previous studies, we further found that mental strain mediated the relationship between psychosocial job demands and health problems. Our findings suggest that interventions aimed at maintaining health in the context of work may take action on three levels: (1) the prevention of extensive job demands, (2) the reduction of work-related mental strain, and (3) the strengthening of resources.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 15%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 40 34%