↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Challenges to Mean-Based Analysis in Psychology: The Contrast Between Individual People and General Science

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Challenges to Mean-Based Analysis in Psychology: The Contrast Between Individual People and General Science
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig P. Speelman, Marek McGann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Macao 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 41%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Linguistics 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,920,193
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,969
of 29,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,302
of 343,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#181
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.