↓ Skip to main content

Which Are the Most Burdensome Functioning Areas in Depression? A Cross-National Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which Are the Most Burdensome Functioning Areas in Depression? A Cross-National Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaloyan Kamenov, Francisco Felix Caballero, Marta Miret, Matilde Leonardi, Päivi Sainio, Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Josep Maria Haro, Somnath Chatterji, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Maria Cabello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 25%
Psychology 11 15%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,160,066
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,094
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,744
of 354,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#264
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.