You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Work Characteristics and Occupational Well-Being: The Role of Age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannes Zacher, Antje Schmitt |
| Abstract |
Based on a lifespan perspective on work design, person-environment interaction and fit theories, models of successful aging at work, and role theory, we review research on the role of worker age in relationships between work characteristics and occupational well-being. We first focus on interaction effects of work characteristics and age on occupational well-being. Research has found that age can moderate associations between work characteristics and occupational well-being indicators, and that work characteristics can moderate associations between age and occupational well-being indicators. Next, we describe research showing that work characteristics can mediate associations between age and occupational well-being indicators. The relationships of age with specific work characteristics and occupational well-being indicators can be linear or non-linear. We conclude our literature review by discussing implications for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,093,282
of 24,699,496 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,674
of 33,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,700
of 327,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#359
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,699,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.