↓ Skip to main content

Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cut-Off Points for Mild, Moderate, and Severe Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Variability and Influence of Sex and Catastrophizing
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne M. Boonstra, Roy E. Stewart, Albère J. A. Köke, René F. A. Oosterwijk, Jeannette L. Swaan, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 428 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 16%
Student > Bachelor 55 13%
Researcher 31 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 142 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 15%
Psychology 23 5%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 2%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 163 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#25,754
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,455
of 334,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#350
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.