↓ Skip to main content

Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Fuchs, Jelena Krivokapić

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to investigate duration between successive keystrokes during typing in order to examine whether prosodic boundaries are expressed in the process of writing. In particular, we are interested in interkey durations that occur next to punctuation marks (comma and full stops while taking keystrokes between words as a reference), since these punctuation marks are often realized with minor or major prosodic boundaries during overt reading. A two-part experiment was conducted: first, participants' keystrokes on a computer keyboard were recorded while writing an email to a close friend (in two conditions: with and without time pressure). Second, participants read the email they just wrote. Interkey durations were compared to pause durations at the same locations during read speech. Results provide evidence of significant differences between interkey durations between words, at commas and at full stops (from shortest to longest). These durations were positively correlated with silent pause durations during overt reading. A more detailed analysis of interkey durations revealed patterns that can be interpreted with respect to prosodic boundaries in speech production, namely as phrase-final and phrase-initial lengthening occurring at punctuation marks. This work provides initial evidence that prosodic boundaries are reflected in the writing process.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 4 20%
Psychology 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Computer Science 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%