↓ Skip to main content

Caffeine Enhances Memory Performance in Young Adults during Their Non-optimal Time of Day

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 34,766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
86 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
59 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caffeine Enhances Memory Performance in Young Adults during Their Non-optimal Time of Day
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M. Sherman, Timothy P. Buckley, Elsa Baena, Lee Ryan

Abstract

Many college students struggle to perform well on exams in the early morning. Although students drink caffeinated beverages to feel more awake, it is unclear whether these actually improve performance. After consuming coffee (caffeinated or decaffeinated), college-age adults completed implicit and explicit memory tasks in the early morning and late afternoon (Experiment 1). During the morning, participants ingesting caffeine demonstrated a striking improvement in explicit memory, but not implicit memory. Caffeine did not alter memory performance in the afternoon. In Experiment 2, participants engaged in cardiovascular exercise in order to examine whether increases in physiological arousal similarly improved memory. Despite clear increases in physiological arousal, exercise did not improve memory performance compared to a stretching control condition. These results suggest that caffeine has a specific benefit for memory during students' non-optimal time of day - early morning. These findings have real-world implications for students taking morning exams.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 31%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 5%
Researcher 10 4%
Other 8 3%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 91 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 96 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 750. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#26,777
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#40
of 34,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#476
of 314,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#1
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.