↓ Skip to main content

A Quantitative Relationship between Signal Detection in Attention and Approach/Avoidance Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Quantitative Relationship between Signal Detection in Attention and Approach/Avoidance Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijay Viswanathan, John P. Sheppard, Byoung W. Kim, Christopher L. Plantz, Hao Ying, Myung J. Lee, Kalyan Raman, Frank J. Mulhern, Martin P. Block, Bobby Calder, Sang Lee, Dale T. Mortensen, Anne J. Blood, Hans C. Breiter

Abstract

This study examines how the domains of reward and attention, which are often studied as independent processes, in fact interact at a systems level. We operationalize divided attention with a continuous performance task and variables from signal detection theory (SDT), and reward/aversion with a keypress task measuring approach/avoidance in the framework of relative preference theory (RPT). Independent experiments with the same subjects showed a significant association between one SDT and two RPT variables, visualized as a three-dimensional structure. Holding one of these three variables constant, further showed a significant relationship between a loss aversion-like metric from the approach/avoidance task, and the response bias observed during the divided attention task. These results indicate that a more liberal response bias under signal detection (i.e., a higher tolerance for noise, resulting in a greater proportion of false alarms) is associated with higher "loss aversion." Furthermore, our functional model suggests a mechanism for processing constraints with divided attention and reward/aversion. Together, our results argue for a systematic relationship between divided attention and reward/aversion processing in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 30%
Neuroscience 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,297,676
of 24,256,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,265
of 32,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,669
of 314,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#336
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,256,961 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.