↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Macrocognition: The Science and Engineering of Sociotechnical Work Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Macrocognition: The Science and Engineering of Sociotechnical Work Systems
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Ward, Robert R. Hoffman, Gareth E. Conway, Jan Maarten Schraagen, David Peebles, Robert J. B. Hutton, Erich J. Petushek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 15%
Psychology 5 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,661,703
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,053
of 33,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,235
of 314,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#282
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.