Title |
Modernizing Relationship Therapy through Social Thermoregulation Theory: Evidence, Hypotheses, and Explorations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00635 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hans IJzerman, Emma C. E. Heine, Saskia K. Nagel, Tila M. Pronk |
Abstract |
In the present article the authors propose to modernize relationship therapy by integrating novel sensor and actuator technologies that can help optimize people's thermoregulation, especially as they pertain to social contexts. Specifically, they propose to integrate Social Thermoregulation Theory (IJzerman et al., 2015a; IJzerman and Hogerzeil, 2017) into Emotionally Focused Therapy by first doing exploratory research during couples' therapy, followed by Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs). The authors thus suggest crafting a Social Thermoregulation Therapy (STT) as enhancement to existing relationship therapies. The authors outline what is known and not known in terms of social thermoregulatory mechanisms, what kind of data collection and analyses are necessary to better understand social thermoregulatory mechanisms to craft interventions, and stress the need to conduct RCTs prior to implementation. They further warn against too hastily applying these theoretical perspectives. The article concludes by outlining why STT is the way forward in improving relationship functioning. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 19% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
China | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 25 | 50% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |