↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Psychological Attributes in Psychology – An Epistemological Discussion: Network Analysis vs. Latent Variables

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling Psychological Attributes in Psychology – An Epistemological Discussion: Network Analysis vs. Latent Variables
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hervé Guyon, Bruno Falissard, Jean-Luc Kop

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 13%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 70 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 40%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 75 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,674,076
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,806
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,474
of 330,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#211
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.