↓ Skip to main content

How Do Student Prior Achievement and Homework Behaviors Relate to Perceived Parental Involvement in Homework?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Do Student Prior Achievement and Homework Behaviors Relate to Perceived Parental Involvement in Homework?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01217
Pubmed ID
Authors

José C. Núñez, Joyce L. Epstein, Natalia Suárez, Pedro Rosário, Guillermo Vallejo, Antonio Valle

Abstract

This study investigated how students' prior achievement is related to their homework behaviors (i.e., time spent on homework, homework time management, and amount of homework), and to their perceptions of parental involvement in homework (i.e., parental control and parental support). A total of 1250 secondary students from 7 to 10th grade participated in the study. Structural equation models were fitted to the data, compared, and a partial mediation model was chosen. The results indicated that students' prior academic performance was significantly associated with both of the students' homework variables, with direct and indirect results linking achievement and homework behaviors with perceived parental control and support behaviors about homework. Low-achieving students, in particular, perceived more parental control of homework in the secondary grades. These results, together with those of previous research, suggest a recursive relationship between secondary school students' achievement and their perceptions of parental involvement in homework, which represents the process of student learning and family engagement over time. Study limitations and educational implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 39 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Psychology 11 12%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 42 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,438,227
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,364
of 30,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,018
of 317,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#503
of 560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.