↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Psychometrics in Individual Differences Research in Cognition: A Case Study of the AX-CPT
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelly R. Cooper, Corentin Gonthier, Deanna M. Barch, Todd S. Braver

Abstract

Investigating individual differences in cognition requires addressing questions not often thought about in standard experimental designs, especially regarding the psychometric properties of the task. Using the AX-CPT cognitive control task as a case study example, we address four concerns that one may encounter when researching the topic of individual differences in cognition. First, we demonstrate the importance of variability in task scores, which in turn directly impacts reliability, particularly when comparing correlations in different populations. Second, we demonstrate the importance of variability and reliability for evaluating potential failures to replicate predicted correlations, even within the same population. Third, we demonstrate how researchers can turn to evaluating psychometric properties as a way of evaluating the feasibility of utilizing the task in new settings (e.g., online administration). Lastly, we show how the examination of psychometric properties can help researchers make informed decisions when designing a study, such as determining the appropriate number of trials for a task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 160 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 24%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 42%
Neuroscience 12 8%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,563,093
of 24,450,293 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,267
of 32,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,207
of 319,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#254
of 601 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,450,293 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 601 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.