↓ Skip to main content

Position Affects Performance in Multiple-Object Tracking in Rugby Union Players

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Position Affects Performance in Multiple-Object Tracking in Rugby Union Players
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Martín, Ana M. Sfer, Marcela A. D'Urso Villar, José F. Barraza

Abstract

We report an experiment that examines the performance of rugby union players and a control group composed of graduate student with no sport experience, in a multiple-object tracking task. It compares the ability of 86 high level rugby union players grouped as Backs and Forwards and the control group, to track a subset of randomly moving targets amongst the same number of distractors. Several difficulties were included in the experimental design in order to evaluate possible interactions between the relevant variables. Results show that the performance of the Backs is better than that of the other groups, but the occurrence of interactions precludes an isolated groups analysis. We interpret the results within the framework of visual attention and discuss both, the implications of our results and the practical consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Professor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 23%
Sports and Recreations 7 18%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Decision Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,503,827
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,730
of 32,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,372
of 319,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#290
of 599 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 599 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.