You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01603 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Robertson-Wilson, Mark Eys, Tom J. Hazell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 73% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 84 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 86 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,904,453
of 24,001,212 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,430
of 32,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,440
of 319,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#227
of 583 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,001,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 583 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.