You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
White Matter Correlates of Musical Anhedonia: Implications for Evolution of Music
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01664 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Psyche Loui, Sean Patterson, Matthew E. Sachs, Yvonne Leung, Tima Zeng, Emily Przysinda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 21% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 74% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#235,336
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#501
of 34,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,848
of 329,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.