↓ Skip to main content

Consumer Neuroscience-Based Metrics Predict Recall, Liking and Viewing Rates in Online Advertising

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumer Neuroscience-Based Metrics Predict Recall, Liking and Viewing Rates in Online Advertising
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Guixeres, Enrique Bigné, Jose M. Ausín Azofra, Mariano Alcañiz Raya, Adrián Colomer Granero, Félix Fuentes Hurtado, Valery Naranjo Ornedo

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether the effectiveness of a new ad on digital channels (YouTube) can be predicted by using neural networks and neuroscience-based metrics (brain response, heart rate variability and eye tracking). Neurophysiological records from 35 participants were exposed to 8 relevant TV Super Bowl commercials. Correlations between neurophysiological-based metrics, ad recall, ad liking, the ACE metrix score and the number of views on YouTube during a year were investigated. Our findings suggest a significant correlation between neuroscience metrics and self-reported of ad effectiveness and the direct number of views on the YouTube channel. In addition, and using an artificial neural network based on neuroscience metrics, the model classifies (82.9% of average accuracy) and estimate the number of online views (mean error of 0.199). The results highlight the validity of neuromarketing-based techniques for predicting the success of advertising responses. Practitioners can consider the proposed methodology at the design stages of advertising content, thus enhancing advertising effectiveness. The study pioneers the use of neurophysiological methods in predicting advertising success in a digital context. This is the first article that has examined whether these measures could actually be used for predicting views for advertising on YouTube.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Master 25 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 84 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 48 19%
Neuroscience 23 9%
Psychology 15 6%
Social Sciences 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 94 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,420,138
of 24,667,989 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,367
of 33,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,228
of 334,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#172
of 607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,667,989 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.