↓ Skip to main content

Dark Triad, Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Political Skills

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dark Triad, Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Political Skills
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad A. Baloch, Fanchen Meng, Zefeng Xu, Ignacio Cepeda-Carrion, Danish, Muhammad W. Bari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 41 31%
Psychology 28 21%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,236,268
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,307
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,049
of 346,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#183
of 620 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 620 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.