You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid Adaptation of Night Vision
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam Reeves, Rebecca Grayhem, Alex D. Hwang |
Abstract |
Apart from the well-known loss of color vision and of foveal acuity that characterizes human rod-mediated vision, it has also been thought that night vision is very slow (taking up to 40 min) to adapt to changes in light levels. Even cone-mediated, daylight, vision has been thought to take 2 min to recover from light adaptation. Here, we show that most, though not all adaptation is rapid, taking less than 0.6 s. Thus, monochrome (black-white-gray) images can be presented at mesopic light levels and be visible within a few 10th of a second, even if the overall light level, or level of glare (as with passing headlamps while driving), changes abruptly. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,372,208
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,266
of 30,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,671
of 441,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#355
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.