You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Homework Feedback Is…”: Elementary and Middle School Teachers’ Conceptions of Homework Feedback
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Cunha, Pedro Rosário, José Carlos Núñez, Ana Rita Nunes, Tânia Moreira, Tânia Nunes |
| Abstract |
This study explored mathematics teachers' conceptions of the homework feedback focusing on four key aspects: definition, purpose, types, and perceived impact. Forty-seven teachers from elementary and middle schools participated in six focus groups. Data were analyzed using content analysis. To enhance the trustworthiness of findings, classroom observations were used for triangulation of data. Participants conceptualized homework feedback in three directions (i.e., teachers' feedback provided to students, students' feedback provided to teachers, and homework self-feedback), being teachers' monitoring of students' learning the purpose reported by most teachers. Participants also reported the types of homework feedback more frequently used in class (e.g., checking homework completion, checking homework on the board), and their perceived impact on students. Findings provide valuable information to deepen the understanding of the homework feedback process, which may help develop new avenues for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Portugal | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,851,276
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,414
of 30,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,260
of 437,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#122
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.