↓ Skip to main content

Preferences for Online and/or Face-to-Face Counseling among University Students in Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preferences for Online and/or Face-to-Face Counseling among University Students in Malaysia
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kah P. Wong, Gregory Bonn, Cai L. Tam, Chee P. Wong

Abstract

Increasingly, online counseling is considered to be a cost-effective and highly accessible method of providing basic counseling and mental health services. To examine the potential of online delivery as a way of increasing overall usage of services, this study looked at students' attitudes toward and likelihood of using both online and/or face-to-face counseling. A survey was conducted with 409 students from six universities in Malaysia participating. Approximately 35% of participants reported that they would be likely to utilize online counseling services but would be unlikely to participate in face-to-face counseling. Based on these results, it is suggested that offering online counseling, in addition to face-to-face services, could be an effective way for many university counseling centers to increase the utilization of their services and thus better serve their communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Lecturer 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 89 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 25%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Computer Science 16 7%
Arts and Humanities 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 94 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,225,969
of 24,843,842 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,451
of 33,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,148
of 450,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#104
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,843,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.