↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Birdsong

Abstract

Much of what is known about the outcome of second language acquisition and bilingualism can be summarized in terms of inter-individual variability, plasticity and age. The present review looks at variability and plasticity with respect to their underlying sources, and at age as a modulating factor in variability and plasticity. In this context we consider critical period effects vs. bilingualism effects, early and late bilingualism, nativelike and non-nativelike L2 attainment, cognitive aging, individual differences in learning, and linguistic dominance in bilingualism. Non-uniformity is an inherent characteristic of both early and late bilingualism. This review shows how plasticity and age connect with biological and experiential sources of variability, and underscores the value of research that reveals and explains variability. In these ways the review suggests how plasticity, variability and age conspire to frame fundamental research issues in L2 acquisition and bilingualism, and provides points of reference for discussion of the present Frontiers in Psychology Research Topic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 340 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 130 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 87 26%
Psychology 48 14%
Neuroscience 17 5%
Arts and Humanities 13 4%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 142 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,954,949
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,594
of 30,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,806
of 332,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#154
of 577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.