↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Grit-S Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Grit-S Scale
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose L. Arco-Tirado, Francisco D. Fernández-Martín, Rick H. Hoyle

Abstract

This paper describes the development and initial validation of a Spanish version of the Short Grit (Grit-S) Scale. The Grit-S Scale was adapted and translated into Spanish using the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pre-testing, and Documentation model and responses to a preliminary set of items from a large sample of university students (N= 1,129). The resultant measure was validated using data from a large stratified random sample of young adults (N= 1,826). Initial validation involved evaluating the internal consistency of the adapted scale and its subscales and comparing the factor structure of the adapted version to that of the original scale. The results were comparable to results from similar analyses of the English version of the scale. Although the internal consistency of the subscales was low, the internal consistency of the full scale was well-within the acceptable range. A two-factor model offered an acceptable account of the data; however, when a single correlated error involving two highly similar items was included, a single factor model fit the data very well. The results support the use of overall scores from the Spanish Grit-S Scale in future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Lecturer 9 9%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 31%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,488,947
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,964
of 30,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,459
of 437,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#384
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.