You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-cognitive Characteristics of Gifted Students With Learning Disabilities: An In-depth Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Else Beckmann, Alexander Minnaert |
| Abstract |
Gifted students who also have learning disabilities (G/LD) are often overlooked when students are assessed either for giftedness or specific learning disabilities. The cognitive and non-cognitive characteristics of these G/LD students are habitually discussed only briefly alongside identification and intervention issues and, beyond that, the relevance of non-cognitive characteristics is often left unconsidered. Accordingly, this study aims to conduct an in-depth review of the non-cognitive characteristics of these students for identification and intervention purposes. Detailed analysis was performed on 23 publications. High levels of negative emotions, low self-perception, and adverse interpersonal relationships, as well as high levels of motivation, coping skills and perseverance were found among these students. A common characteristic was a high degree of frustration with the academic situation. The study reveals that these students show considerably duality in their non-cognitive characteristics which requires tailored counseling skills to provide effective support for their learning needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 82 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 92 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,345,306
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,794
of 34,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,077
of 340,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#80
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.