You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Costa, Luísa Faria |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Singapore | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 386 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 8% |
| Researcher | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 16% |
| Unknown | 124 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 113 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 13 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 143 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,601,033
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,313
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,283
of 346,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#90
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.