You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misophonia and Potential Underlying Mechanisms: A Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Devon B. Palumbo, Ola Alsalman, Dirk De Ridder, Jae-Jin Song, Sven Vanneste |
| Abstract |
There is a growing research interest in the diagnosis rate of misophonia, a condition characterized by a negative emotional/autonomic reaction to specific everyday sounds. Diagnosis of misophonia requires a thorough case history and audiological test procedures. Associative and non-associative learning models for understanding the underlying mechanisms of misophonia have been presented. Currently, there is no cure or pharmaceutical agent for misophonia; however, therapy programs addressing misophonia and its characteristics do exist. Investigation of comorbid conditions and other psychological therapy strategies might help to reveal more about the underlying mechanisms and potentially lead to a successful treatment method. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#339,843
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#692
of 34,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,389
of 343,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#19
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.