↓ Skip to main content

The Triadic Roots of Human Cognition: “Mind” Is the Ability to go Beyond Dyadic Associations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Triadic Roots of Human Cognition: “Mind” Is the Ability to go Beyond Dyadic Associations
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman D. Cook

Abstract

Empirical evidence is reviewed indicating that the extraordinary aspects of the human mind are due to our species' ability to go beyond simple "dyadic associations" and to process the relations among three items of information simultaneously. Classic explanations of the "triadic" nature of human skills have been advocated by various scholars in the context of the evolution of human cognition. Here I summarize the core processes as found in (i) the syntax of language, (ii) tool-usage, and (iii) joint attention. I then review the triadic foundations of two perceptual phenomena of great importance in human aesthetics: (iv) harmony perception and (v) pictorial depth perception. In all five subfields of human psychology, most previous work has emphasized the recursive, hierarchical complexity of such "higher cognition," but a strongly reductionist approach indicates that the core mechanisms are triadic. It is concluded that the cognitive skills traditionally considered to be "uniquely" human require three-way associational processing that most non-Primate animal species find difficult or impossible, but all members of Homo sapiens - regardless of small cultural differences - find easy and inherently intriguing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 27%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Psychology 4 15%
Arts and Humanities 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,753,847
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,294
of 31,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,605
of 327,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#177
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.