Title |
The Triadic Roots of Human Cognition: “Mind” Is the Ability to go Beyond Dyadic Associations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01060 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Norman D. Cook |
Abstract |
Empirical evidence is reviewed indicating that the extraordinary aspects of the human mind are due to our species' ability to go beyond simple "dyadic associations" and to process the relations among three items of information simultaneously. Classic explanations of the "triadic" nature of human skills have been advocated by various scholars in the context of the evolution of human cognition. Here I summarize the core processes as found in (i) the syntax of language, (ii) tool-usage, and (iii) joint attention. I then review the triadic foundations of two perceptual phenomena of great importance in human aesthetics: (iv) harmony perception and (v) pictorial depth perception. In all five subfields of human psychology, most previous work has emphasized the recursive, hierarchical complexity of such "higher cognition," but a strongly reductionist approach indicates that the core mechanisms are triadic. It is concluded that the cognitive skills traditionally considered to be "uniquely" human require three-way associational processing that most non-Primate animal species find difficult or impossible, but all members of Homo sapiens - regardless of small cultural differences - find easy and inherently intriguing. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Japan | 2 | 10% |
Turkey | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
South Africa | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 27% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 19% |
Psychology | 4 | 15% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 12% |
Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |