↓ Skip to main content

Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
29 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Martela, Tapani J. J. Riekki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 456 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 7%
Lecturer 17 4%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 167 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 100 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 60 13%
Social Sciences 34 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Arts and Humanities 10 2%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 178 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#846,341
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,768
of 34,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,901
of 339,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#50
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.